Received 11.04.2023, Revised 13.08.2023, Accepted 02.10.2023
The article points out the prevalence of cryptocurrencies in modern society and explores the peculiarities of their use. The systematization of literary sources, foreign experience and market data shows that there is a debate and certain differences in the understanding and interpretation of the essence of cryptocurrency, which affects its introduction into business activities and use by citizens both at the legislative level and by the financial system. The urgency of solving this problem lies in the fact that the state must respond quickly to changes in society and adapt to them, preventing negative consequences, first of all, for the state itself, as well as for ordinary citizens. The methodological basis of the study is the use of methods of analysis, synthesis, theoretical generalization, economic and statistical methods. The article identifies the main features of cryptocurrency as a phenomenon and ways of its use. The expediency of its introduction into legal circulation is substantiated. The negative aspects that harm the financial system of the state and the factors that help the latter to develop are highlighted. Foreign experience of regulating the use of cryptocurrency and its taxation is presented, which has a positive impact on the legal and financial spheres of state activity. Given the identified weaknesses and strengths of cryptocurrencies, the threats to the use of cryptocurrencies and further opportunities for it are formulated. The article examines the current state of development of the cryptocurrency market and compares it with the market of 2017: the price, market capitalization and percentage of the total market capitalization of cryptocurrencies are analyzed. The article lists possible investment activities related to cryptocurrency. The impact of cryptocurrencies on the environment is studied. The necessity of state intervention in regulating the circulation of cryptocurrencies is indicated, finding options for overcoming the consequences of the weaknesses of cryptocurrencies
currency; cryptocurrency; financial instrument; taxation; investment
[1] Judgment of the European court of justice of October 22, 2015, case C-264/14 "Swedish Tax Authority v. David Hedquist". Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/%20PDF/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0264.
[2] Nekit, K.H. (2021). Dynamics of legal regulation of cryptocurrencies (crypto-assets) in Japan. In Science and social life of Ukraine in the era of global challenges for humanity in the digital era: Materials of the International scientific and practical conference on the occasion of the 30th anniversary. Strengths Possibility of increasing the standard of living of the population Another method of payment that meets the current state of development of society A tool for investment, development of the financial system, budget revenues, and creation of new jobs. An area for taxation and budget revenues, 2, 449-451. Odesa: Vydavnychyi dim "Helvetyka".
[3] Vartist 1 Bitcoin. (2023). Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoin/.
[4] Total Cryptocurrency Market Cap. (2023). Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/.
[5] Shirinian, L.V., & Rohanova, H.O. (2018). Features of the functioning of the cryptocurrency "Bitcoin". Biznes Inform, 8, 145-152.
[6] Todayʼs Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Cap. (2023). Retrieved from https://coinmarketcap.com.
[7] 46,351 bitcoins were declared by Posad residents. (2023). Retrieved from https://opendatabot.ua/analytics/bitcoin-2021.
[8] OECD. Taxing Virtual Currencies: An Overview of Tax Treatments and Emerging Tax Policy Issues. Paris. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/taxing-virtual-currencies-an-overview-of-tax-treatments-and-emerging-tax-policyissues.pdf.
[9] Taxation of income from the sale of cryptocurrency: individual tax advice of the State Tax Service 4928/IPK/99-00-04-05-03-06. (2020, December). Retrieved from https://buhgalter911.com/normativnayabaza/pisma/gpsu/list-dps-vid-1055827.html.
[10 ] Europol. Internet organized crime threat assessment. (2017). Retrieved from https://www.europol.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/iocta2017.pdf.
[11] Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. (2023). Bitcoin network power demand. Retrieved from https://ccaf.io/cbnsi/cbeci.
[12] Cambridge Bitcoin Electricity Consumption Index. (2023). Bitcoin greenhouse gas emissions. Retrieved from https://ccaf.io/cbnsi/cbeci/ghg.
[13] Apolline, B., Dr. Gina, P., Yue, W., Thomas, E., Anton, D., Sean, T., & Damaris, N.. (2020). 3RD Global cryptoasset benchmarking study. Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. University of Cambridge.