Received 10.08.2023, Revised 30.10.2023, Accepted 28.12.2023
The research relevance is determined by the fact that, despite the emergence of more modern gambling, millions of people around the world participate in lotteries every year, and this number is steadily growing. The study aims to assess the prospects for the development of the lottery business in the context of the state monopoly on this industry, as well as to consider possible risks for the economy. The structural-functional method was used as a basis for studying the place of the lottery business in the economic system on the example of different countries; the historical method addressed the peculiarities of the origin of lotteries in the world. The study conducted a comprehensive study of the stages of formation of modern models of lottery activity in the leading countries of the world, such as the USA, Great Britain and China. The reasons for the emergence of lotteries, their advantages and disadvantages, as well as the role of government agencies in regulating this activity were investigated. In particular, the study analysed the models of a complete ban, a free market and a state monopoly, as well as the impact of lotteries on the economy and society. The study showed that the high level of profitability of the lottery business allows organisers to make stable contributions to the state budget and charitable organisations, solving social and humanitarian problems. The results of the study determined the optimal model of the lottery business, formulated the prospects for the development of this type of activity at the present stage, and assessed the role of the state authorities in this process. The study materials can be used by public authorities engaged in reforming the legislative framework in the field of gambling
gambling business; gambling; legislation; budget; financing
[1] Agha, S.A.U., Mohammad, S.B., & Saleem, M. (2021). Lottery in the light of Shariah & jurisprudence (scientific and research review). Islamic Culture, 46(2), 125-146. doi: 10.46568/tis.v46i2.803.
[2] Beckert, J., & Lutter, M. (2013). Why the poor play the lottery: Sociological approaches to explaining class-based lottery play. Sociology, 47(6), 1152-1170. doi: 10.1177/0038038512457854.
[3] Bolkvadze, B. (2023). Some aspects of the gambling business impact on the economy of Georgia. Economists, 18(3), 57-70. doi: 10.36172/EKONOMISTI.2022.XVIII.03.Besik.Bolkvadze.
[4] Burger, M.J., Hendriks, M., Pleeging, E., & van Ours, J.C. (2020). The joy of lottery play: Evidence from a field experiment. Experimental Economics, 23(4), 1235-1256. doi: 10.1007/s10683-020-09649-9.
[5] Camelot Group. (2023). Reports and financial statements 2023. Retrieved from https://annualreport2023.camelotgroup.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Camelot-AR2023-Full-Reports-and-Financial-Statements.pdf.
[6] Clotfelter, C.T. (2023). Better state lotteries. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 52(3), 287-313. doi: 10.1177/10911421231206030.
[7] Cohen, J.D. (2022). For a dollar and a dream: State lotteries in modern America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780197604885.001.0001.
[8] Cornea, V., & Matic A.-E. (2021). The institution of lottery: Between profit and social responsibility. In Proceedings of the 38th international Business Information Management Association Conference (pp. 6386-6394). Seville: International Business Information Management Association.
[9] Del Viva, L., Kasanen, E., Saunders, A., & Trigeorgis, L. (2021). US government TARP bailout and bank lottery behavior. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, article number 101777. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101777.
[10] Díaz, A., & Pérez, L. (2021). Setting the odds of winning the jackpot: On the economics of (re) designing lottery games. Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(1), 168-177. doi: 10.1111/coep.12475.
[11] Fu, H.-N., Monson, E., & Otto, A.R. (2021). Relationships between socio-economic status and lottery gambling across lottery types: Neighborhood-level evidence from a large city. Addiction, 116(5), 1256-1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15252.
[12] Ivanov, K. (2020). Monopolistic Vs. Competitive “lottery”. In Proceedings of the jubilee international scientific conference dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the University of Economics – Varna “Economic Science, Education and the Real Economy: Development and interactions in the digital age” (pp. 309-319). Varna: University of Economics.
[13] Ivanov, K. (2021). Betting and lottery business – polices, taxes and benefits. University Economic Bulletin, 49, 174-180. doi: 10.31470/2306-546X-2021-49-174-181.
[14] Ji, Y., Qiao, D., Hao, R., Qin, R., & Xu, T. (2024). Buying a wealthy dream: Determinants of rural residents’ lottery purchase behavior in China. Journal of Gambling Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10899-024-10286-7.
[15] Kim, S., & Oswald, A.J. (2020). Happy lottery winners and lottery-ticket bias. Review of Income and Wealth, 67(2), 317-333. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12469.
[16] Lyskov, M. (2017). The origin and development of the lottery sphere until the 19th century. Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Series Law, 42, 182-185.
[17] Marionneau, V., Egerer, M., & Nikkinen, J. (2021). How do state gambling monopolies affect levels of gambling harm? Current Addiction Reports, 8(2), 225-234. doi: 10.1007/s40429-021-00370-y.
[18] McCrary, J., & Condrey, S.E. (2003). The Georgia lottery: Assessing its administrative, economic, and political effects. Review of Policy Research, 20(4), 691-712. doi: 10.1046/j.1541-1338.2003.00047.x.
[19] Metzker, Z., & Streimikis, J. (2020). Lotteries in Slovakia. The business legislation in the lotteries segment and selected Slovakia’s region population’s relationship to gambling. Adjunctologies, 20(3-4), 125-135. doi: 10.35198/01-2020-002-0006.
[20] Nirantechaphat, W., & Nedpogaeo, A. (2023). Communication for power negotiation of the underground lotto gamblers. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Reviews, 3(4), 239-248. doi: 10.60027/ijsasr.2023.3116.
[21] Peng, Ya., Song, W., & Ren, D. (2015). Research on the management system of China’s lottery industry. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8(6), 917-924. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.86093.
[22] Pohoretskyi, M., Cherniak, A., Serhieieva, D., Toporetska, Z., & Iskenderov, E. (2022). State monopoly on gambling on the example of the organization lotteries by state-owned banks. Amazonia Investiga, 11(54), 357-366. doi: 10.34069/AI/2022.54.06.34.
[23] Roukka, T., & Salonen, A.H. (2020). The winners and the losers: Tax incidence of gambling in Finland. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1183-1204. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09899-0.
[24] Statista. (2024a). Sales of lotteries in the United States in 2023 (in million U.S. dollars), by state. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/388238/sales-of-lotteries-by-state-us/.
[25] Statista. (2024b). Online lottery – Worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/outlook/amo/online-gambling/online-lottery/worldwide.
[26] Ulvidienė, E., Meškauskaitė, I., Giedraitis, V., & Stavytskyy, A. (2023). The relationship between GDP and tax revenues from the market of gambling and lotteries in Lithuania. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 1(222), 148-155. doi: 10.17721/1728-2667.2023/222-1/19.
[27] van Wyk, D., & van der Merwe, A. (2022). An exploratory study on value-added tax consequences of a residential property lottery in South Africa. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 37(1), 19-34. doi: 10.1080/10291954.2022.2069388.
[28] Walker, D.M. (2024). Book review: For a dollar and a dream: State lotteries in modern America. The American Economist. doi: 10.1177/05694345241266677.
[29] Willmann, G. (1999). The history of lotteries. Stanford: Stanford University.
[30] Yuan, J., & Gao, J.Z. (2015). What drives lottery demand? Evidence from China’s lottery practice. International Gambling Studies, 15(1), 159-178. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2014.1003316.
[31] Zhang, J. (2024). Comparative analysis of the business strategies of China welfare lottery and China sports lottery. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 24, 588-593. doi: 10.54097/5w70eb80.