ISSN 2308-8559 e-ISSN 2415-8224
en

https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/1.2026.65

Volume 16, No. 1, 2026

65-73

  • Read article

    • Social innovation as a driver of household standard of living: Insights from selected states in Nigeria

    Falilat Ajoke Abdul

    Received 10.11.2025, Revised 09.02.2026, Accepted 26.03.2026 Published 01.04.2026

    Abstract

    In developing economies, grassroots-level interventions that reconfigure existing systems showed increasing potential for poverty reduction and welfare enhancement. This study investigated how social innovation dimensions influenced household economic welfare among smallholder farmers in Nigeria. Specifically, it examined the effects of new services/products (farm advisory, crop insurance, weather forecasts), new practices (climate-smart agriculture, organic farming, integrated pest management), and new processes (e-marketing, digital payments, supply chain optimisation) on household standard of living across Adamawa, Kano, and Oyo States. Using a cross-sectional survey design, data was collected from farmers belonging to three agricultural non-governmental organisations KickStart, TechnoServe, and AGRA. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling revealed that new practices exerted the strongest positive influence on household standard of living (β = 0.669, t = 10.183, p < 0.000), followed by new processes (β = 0.322, t = 5.299, p < 0.000). New services/products showed a negative but significant effect (β = -0.150, t = 2.555, p = 0.011), suggesting implementation challenges or adoption barriers. The combined model explained 69.4% of variance in household standard of living (R² = 0.694). Economic indicators showed that 56.1% of farmers reported revenue increases from new products, while 48.3% experienced enhanced productivity through innovative practices. The findings confirmed that social innovation significantly drove household economic welfare among Nigerian smallholder farmers. Practically, these results provided evidence-based guidance for NGOs and policymakers to prioritise capacity-building in sustainable farming practices and digital agricultural processes, while addressing barriers in service/product uptake to maximise poverty reduction outcomes

    Keywords:

    agricultural innovation; farmer livelihoods; new services/products; new practices; new processes; poverty alleviation

    Suggested citation
    Abdul, F.A. (2026). Social innovation as a driver of household standard of living: Insights from selected states in Nigeria. Economic Forum, 16(1), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/1.2026.65
    138 Views

    References

    1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Robots and jobs: Evidence from US labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 128(6), 2188-2244. doi: 10.1086/705716.
    2. AGRA. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://agra.org.
    3. Akpan, N.S. (2014). Resource-centred rural development plans in Nigeria: Policies, impacts, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 4(12), 1640-1652. doi: 10.9734/BJESBS/2014/11280.
    4. Alfiana, A., Putri, A.N., Sujai, M., Amalo, F., & Hertina, D. (2025). Digital financial inclusion: Examining the role of mobile technology in expanding access to capital. Dinasti International Journal of Economics, Finance & Accounting, 6(1), 42-47. doi: 10.38035/dijefa.v6i1.3806.
    5. Bussell, J. (2019). Clients and constituents: Political responsiveness in patronage democracies (modern South Asia). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    6. Carrasco, S., Ochiai, C., & Tang, L.M. (2024). Social capital and community resilience in the wake of disasters, conflicts and displacements. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 115, article number 105049. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105049.
    7. Chandra, Y. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as institutional-change work: A corpus linguistics analysis. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 14-46. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2016.1233133.
    8. Christens, B.D., & Inzeo, P.T. (2015). Widening the view: Situating collective impact among frameworks for community-led change. Community Development, 46(4), 420-435. doi: 15575330.2015.1061680.
    9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203771587.
    10. Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120. doi: 10.1086/228943.
    11. Corrigan, O., Danielsen, S., Doherty, S., & Lane, P. (2024). Integrated care systems in England: The significance of collaborative community assets in promoting and sustaining health and wellbeing. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, article number 1355215. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1355215.
    12. Deaton, A. (2018). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy (Reissue ed. with a new preface). Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1331-3.
    13. Dushkova, D., & Ivlieva, O. (2024). Empowering communities to act for a change: A review of the community empowerment programs towards sustainability and resilience. Sustainability, 16(19), article number 8700. doi: 10.3390/su16198700.
    14. Edwards, B., & Foley, M.W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1), 124-139. doi: 10.1177/0002764298042001010.
    15. Eichler, G.M., & Schwarz, E.J. (2019). What sustainable development goals do social innovations address? A systematic review and content analysis of social innovation literature. Sustainability, 11(2), article number 522. doi: 10.3390/su11020522.
    16. Espinoza, M., Rivarola, R., Fort, R., & Fisher, J. (2024). Evaluating the efficacy of social innovation programming at advancing rural development in the context of exogenous shocks. Sustainability, 16(13), article number 5664. doi: 10.3390/su16135664.
    17. Fan, W., Meng, M., & Zhou, C. (2024). Research on the impact of economic development and environmental security on human well-being in typical cities on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27, 15677-15702. doi: 10.1007/s10668-024-04560-2.
    18. Grootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding and measuring social capital: A multidisciplinary tool for practitioners. Washington, D.C.: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
    19. Joudar, F., & El Ghmari, O. (2025). The impact of financial inclusion on financial stability: Evidence from MENA and African countries analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression. Economies, 13(5), article number 121. doi: 10.3390/economies13050121.
    20. Karlan, D., Ratan, A.L., & Zinman, J. (2014). Savings by and for the poor: A research review and agenda. The Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 36-78. doi: 10.1111/roiw.12101.
    21. KickStart. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://kickstartagro.com.
    22. Leubold, B., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Moulaert, F. (Eds.). (2017). Social innovation as a trigger for transformations – the role of research. Brussels: European Commission. doi: 10.2777/68949.
    23. Lin, N. (2004). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    24. Martin, R. (2022). Energy housekeeping: Intersections of gender, domestic labour and technologies. Buildings & Cities, 3(1), 554-569. doi: 10.5334/bc.218.
    25. Nova, A.A., Declercq, A., Heckman, G.A., Hirdes, J.P., McAiney, C., & De Lepeleire, J. (2024). Exploring subjective quality-of-life indicators in long-term care facilities: A mixed-methods research protocol. BMJ Open, 14, article number e087380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087380.
    26. Okwu, O.J. (2011). Characterizing farmer users and nonusers of mass media as channels of agricultural information in Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 12(3-4), 315-328. doi: 10.1080/10496505.2011.610709.
    27. Osaghae, E.E. (2015). Resource curse or resource blessing: The case of the Niger Delta ‘oil republic’ in Nigeria. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 53(2), 109-129. doi: 10.1080/14662043.2015.1013297.
    28. Portes, A. (2014). Downsides of social capital. Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, 111(52), 18407-18408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421888112.
    29. Putnam, R.D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Touchstone Books by Simon & Schuster.
    30. Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R.Y. (1994). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    31. Sarwar, S., Alsaggaf, M.I., & Tingqiu, C. (2019). Nexus among economic growth, education, health, and environment: Dynamic analysis of world-level data. Frontiers in Public Health, 7, article number 307. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00307.
    32. Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    33. Shan, H., & Gu, M. (2024). How does digital finance alleviate fiscal stress? Evidence from China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 84, 1202-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2024.10.024.
    34. Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288-1292. doi: 10.1126/science.aah5309.
    35. Tambo, J.A., & Wünscher, T. (2017). Farmer-led innovations and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 263-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.08.018.
    36. TechnoServe. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.technoserve.org.
    37. Teklewold, H., Gebrehiwot, T., & Bezabih, M. (2019). Climate smart agricultural practices and gender differentiated nutrition outcome: An empirical evidence from Ethiopia. World Development, 122, 38-53. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.05.010.
    38. Thapa, B.S., Paudel, M.R., Lanzavecchia, A., & Pathak, D.D. (2025). Socioeconomic determinants of over-indebtedness of microfinance borrowers: Insights for client protection against modern financial challenges. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(1), 143-161. doi: 10.61093/sec.9(1).143-161.2025.
    39. The Declaration of Helsinki. (2013). Retrieved from https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/.