Received 15.06.2023, Revised 05.09.2023, Accepted 01.09.2023
This article examines the essence and role of decent work to ensure greater involvement in the work of different categories of workers in the context of the implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, in particular Goal 8 "Decent work and economic growth". The main goal of the article is to study the role of decent work as a factor in attracting different categories of workers to work in EU countries. Decent work was defined by the ILO in 1999 as one based on the principles of freedom, equality, security and human dignity. According to the ILO, decent work covers four main dimensions: employment, social protection, workers' rights and social dialogue. To prove the influence of decent work on the engagement of different categories of workers, the results of the Sixth European Working Conditions Survey EWCS 2015 were used. This study identified seven aspects related to decent work that can influence engagement at work: physical environment, work intensity, quality working hours, social environment, skills and judgment, prospects and wages. The results of the study showed that dependent self-employed persons have more unstable working conditions than the rest of the professional categories according to most of the analyzed indices. In this context, it is important to approve minimum standards at the EU level to ensure decent work in various industries and regions. It was concluded that the provision of decent work can become not only a tool for achieving the relevant UN Sustainable Development Goal (Goal 8), but also an effective economic stimulus to increase the level of employment of the population, which had negative trends in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the beginning of a full-scale war in Ukraine
decent work; working conditions; involvement in work; quality of work; sustainability
[1] Williams, C.C., & Horodnic, I.A. (2018). Evaluating the prevalence and distribution of dependent self-employment: Some lessons from the European Working Conditions Survey. Industrial Relations Journal, 49(2), 109-127. doi: 10.1111/irj.12206.
[2] Anitha, J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 308-323. doi: 10.1108/IJPPM-01-2013-0008.
[3] Mokaya, S.O., & Kipyegon, M.J. (2014). Determinants of employee engagement in the banking industry in Kenya. Case of Cooperative Bank. Journal of Human Resources Management and Labor Studies, 2, 187-200.
[4] Silla, I., De Cuyper, N., Gracia, F.J., Peiró, J.M., & DeWitte, H. (2009). Job insecurity and well-being: Moderation by employability. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 10(6), 739-751. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9119-0.
[5] Presti, A.L., & Nonnis, M. (2012). Moderated effects of job insecurity on work engagement and distress. TPM-Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19(2), 97-113.
[6] International Labor Organization. (1999). International Labor Organization Decent work for all in a Global Economy: An ILO.
[7] United Nations. (2015). Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.
[8] Aloisi, A. (2018). Facing the challenges of platform-mediated labour: The employment relationship in times of non-standard work and digital transformation. Retrieved from https://iris.unibocconi.it/handle/11565/4054680.
[9] Bruntland, G.H. (1987). World commission on environment and development. Our Common Future, 17, 43-66.
[10] Kahn, W.A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. doi: 10.2307/256287.
[11] Behling, F., & Harvey, M. (2015). The evolution of false self-employment in the British construction industry: A neo-Polanyian account of labour market formation. Work, Employment and Society, 29(6), 969-988. doi: 10.1177/0950017014559960.
[12] Böheim, R., & Muehlberger, U. (2006). Dependent forms of self-employment in the UK: Identifying workers on the border between employment and self-employment. Discussion Paper, 1963.
[13] Eurofound. (2017). Sixth European working conditions survey – Overview report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union
[14] Taylor, M., Marsh, G., Nicol, D., & Broadbent, P. (2017). Good work: The Taylor review of modern working practices. London: BEIS.
[15] Ballout, H.I. (2009). Career commitment and career success: Moderating role of self-efficacy. Career Development International, 14(7), 655-670. doi: 10.1108/13620430911005708.
[16] Van Aerden, K., Moors, G., Levecque, K., & Vanroelen, C. (2015). The relationship between employment quality and work-related well-being in the European Labor Force. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 86, 66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2014.11.001.
[17] Di Fabio, A. (2017). The psychology of sustainability and sustainable development for well-being in organizations. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, article number 1534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01534.
